Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 4 31B IT

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 31B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index27.343.5
Released2023-12-132026-04-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.09
Output $ / M tokens—$0.34
Results tracked2435

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Coding11081459
LMArena WebDev—1366
SciCode—43.4%
WeirdML—52.3%
ALE-Bench—925.5
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Hard Prompts11091448
DTBench45.9%82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04142.74
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—70.6%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—5%
Thematic Generalization—53%
LMCA—39.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—30.6%

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%73.3%
LMArena Math11321465
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
GPQA Diamond34%75.8%
LMArena Expert10591465
SimpleQA Verified—10.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Vision—1277
LMArena Document—1425

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Non-English11381431
LMArena Chinese11241476
LMArena French11451435
LMArena Russian11861460
LMArena Spanish11191444
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Instruction Following11141433

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Longer Query11321446

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Text11491443
LMArena Creative Writing11311415
LMArena Multi-Turn11391452
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1368
EQ-Bench 4—1120

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper