Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 9.3.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.