Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.