Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
StepFunSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.3 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1299 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1304 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1287 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.