Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Flash in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 52.3 to 25.2.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 39.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-04-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 28.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 55.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1424 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 661.88 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 17.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 56.2% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 41.1% |
| BALROG | — | 33.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 548.84 |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 143.03 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 56.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 33.3% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 2.7% |
| DTBench | — | 76.5% |
| LMCA | — | 27.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.6 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1415 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 12.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 16.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1426 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| GeoBench | — | 76% |
| VPCT | — | 46.2% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 36.9% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1433 |
| LMArena German | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1421 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1405 |
| IFEval | — | 89.8% |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1408 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.5% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| WildBench | — | 81.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 2.5 Flash share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54.