Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1316 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1304 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1279 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1287 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1292 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.