Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Falcon-180B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Falcon-180B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.