Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Falcon-180B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.6 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Falcon-180B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.