Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 45.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1403 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.