Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.5 to 35.7.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.845.0
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding11861473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts11461460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.39

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math11521467
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert11421467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English10991445
LMArena Chinese11451510
LMArena Russian10921457
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1411
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Spanish—1453

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following11311439

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query11621454

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text11501454
LMArena Creative Writing11291439
LMArena Multi-Turn11081459

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper