Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1299 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.