Model comparison
Pixtral Large vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.5 to 32.9.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-11-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1089 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Pixtral Large: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 988 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Pixtral Large better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.