Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 55.6 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Falcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.238.9
Released2023-09-062025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
LMArena Coding—1416

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071398
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13139.63
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%
LMArena Math—1394
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%
LMArena Expert—1396
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English10001372
LMArena Chinese—1433
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1337
LMArena Korean—1331
LMArena Russian—1370
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following10471363

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text10541384
LMArena Creative Writing10891317
LMArena Multi-Turn10131378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper