Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.