Model comparison
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 30.4 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1146 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1152 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.