Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Falcon-180B leads 53.4 to 49.0.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1016 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 993 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 947 |
Instruction Following Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 978 |
Writing & Preference Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.