Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Mixtral 8x22B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 31.1 to 15.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index32.427.1
Released—2024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Coding11861166
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11451150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.03
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math11521184
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Expert11421113
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Mixtral 8x22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English10991128
LMArena Chinese11451116
LMArena Russian10921158
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following11311147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query11621144

Writing & Preference Mixtral 8x22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text11501162
LMArena Creative Writing11291141
LMArena Multi-Turn11081130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mixtral 8x22B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper