Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Magistral Medium

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.5 to 29.3.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Magistral Medium specifications
Falcon-180BMagistral Medium
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMistral AI
Noometry Index31.834.8
Released2023-09-062025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$5
Results tracked1622

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
SciCode—39.2%
LMArena Coding—1319

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts10071267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Math—1249
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert—1222
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Magistral Medium leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English10001232
LMArena Chinese—1225
LMArena French—1268
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1176
LMArena Korean—1125
LMArena Russian—1224
LMArena Spanish—1269

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following10471254

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query—1295

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMagistral Medium
LMArena Text10541255
LMArena Creative Writing10891245
LMArena Multi-Turn10131275

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Magistral Medium share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper