Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 47.4 to 25.2.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1350 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1346 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 135.36 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| DTBench | — | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 57.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70.6% | 79.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 64.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1363 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1344 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1340 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1128 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.