Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 19.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-06-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 149.97 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2.7 Code share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.