Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Falcon-180B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek

44.3

Rank #78 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 62.4 to 29.1.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Falcon-180B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
ProviderDeepSeekTechnology Innovation Institute
Noometry Index44.332.2
Released2025-09-292023-09-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.26—
Output $ / M tokens$0.38—
Results tracked4916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65), Falcon-180B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70%—
Aider Polyglot74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1362—
SWE-bench Multilingual59%—
SciCode38.9%—
WeirdML39.5%—
LMArena Coding1454—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59), Falcon-180B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
Terminal-Bench39.6%—
APEX-Agents21.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard56.7%—
TheAgentCompany42.9%—
Vending-Bench 21,034—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
LMArena Hard Prompts14341007
Epoch Capabilities Index146.27112.13
ARC-AGI-24%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)36.7%—
ARC-AGI-157%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Thematic Generalization65%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA29.1%—
HellaSwag—89%
LAMBADA—79.8%
PIQA—84.9%
WinoGrande—87.1%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87), Falcon-180B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions57.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench8%—
LMArena Math1435—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)22.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66), Falcon-180B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
GPQA Diamond83.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.3%—
LMArena Expert1436—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—67.8%
BoolQ—89%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—64.2%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
LMArena Non-English14091000
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1433—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1424—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
LMArena Instruction Following14131047

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16), Falcon-180B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
CL-bench13.2%—
CL-bench Life9.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpFalcon-180B
LMArena Text14251054
LMArena Creative Writing14031089
LMArena Multi-Turn14271013
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1515—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Falcon-180B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Falcon-180B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper