Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 53.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1413 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 153.53 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1407 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1404 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Grok 4.7 share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.