Model comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Falcon-180B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 65.8 to 29.3.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-09 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 393K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 25 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39), Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | 111.89 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1493 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29), Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | — |
Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24), Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43), Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1013 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Falcon-180B?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Falcon-180B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.