Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-6 Luna leads 58.3 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.253.3
Released2023-09-062026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1642

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
DeepSWE—66.6%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1581
SciCode—54.6%
LMArena Coding—1439
ALE-Bench—1,577

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
APEX-Agents—44.3%
GDP.pdf—23%

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Hard Prompts10071411
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13156.28
ARC-AGI-2—59.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—68.7%
ARC-AGI-1—86.7%
CritPt—19.4%
Chess Puzzles—31%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—90.1%
LMCA—44.5%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—78.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—56.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.9%
ProofBench—64%
LMArena Math—1416
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond—90.5%
SimpleQA Verified—41.4%
LMArena Expert—1444
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Vision—1217
Blueprint-Bench 2—31.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Non-English10001386
LMArena Chinese—1433
LMArena French—1420
LMArena German—1369
LMArena Japanese—1369
LMArena Korean—1360
LMArena Russian—1394
LMArena Spanish—1393

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following10471409

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query—1409

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text10541391
LMArena Creative Writing10891363
LMArena Multi-Turn10131396

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-6 Luna share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper