Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Grok 3

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 3 leads 52.3 to 25.2.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Grok 3 specifications
Falcon-180BGrok 3
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstitutexAI
Noometry Index32.239.9
Released2023-09-062025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1640

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%
LMArena Coding—1432

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts10071434
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13138.33
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
LMArena Math—1391
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1421
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
LMArena Non-English10001410
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Russian—1416
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
LMArena Instruction Following10471409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGrok 3
LMArena Text10541426
LMArena Creative Writing10891414
LMArena Multi-Turn10131425
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Grok 3 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper