Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1354 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1353 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1311 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1304 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-4.5V share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.