Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GPT-5.4 mini

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

44.8

Rank #69 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 mini in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 64.2 to 29.3.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GPT-5.4 mini specifications
Falcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index31.844.8
Released2023-09-062026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$4.50
Results tracked1646

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
FrontierCode—27%
LMArena WebDev—1397
SciCode—49.9%
WeirdML—60.3%
LMArena Coding—1438
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
DeepResearch Bench—36.3%

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10071424
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89148.83
ARC-AGI-2—18.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—61.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Thematic Generalization—61.7%
Mystery Game Puzzles—11%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—40.8%
ForecastBench—57
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—51.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—9.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—21%
LMArena Math—1418
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—28.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
GPQA Diamond—86.9%
SimpleQA Verified—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.5%
LMArena Expert—1434
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Non-English10001405
LMArena Chinese—1446
LMArena French—1440
LMArena German—1407
LMArena Japanese—1375
LMArena Korean—1369
LMArena Russian—1417
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Instruction Following10471405

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Longer Query—1407

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Text10541411
LMArena Creative Writing10891370
LMArena Multi-Turn10131429
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1665

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-5.4 mini share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper