Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 18.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 52.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 155.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.