Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Pixtral Large
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Pixtral Large in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 49.5 to 32.9.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Pixtral Large leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1089 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 988 |
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Pixtral Large?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Pixtral Large share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.