Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Pixtral Large
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 32.9.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 31.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Pixtral Large?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.