Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 31.1.
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 29.3 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1101 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1100 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1135 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1111 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1088 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.