Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

44.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads 66.7 to 31.3.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index44.028.8
Released2025-09-292024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked7332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.8 (#54), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding14891102
SWE-bench Verified71.3%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)71.4%—
LMArena WebDev1393—
SWE-bench Multilingual67%—
SciCode44.7%—
GSO14.7%—
WeirdML47.7%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
ALE-Bench796.15—
AlgoTune1.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.1 (#30), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Terminal-Bench46.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard73.2%—
GDPval42.5%—
Remote Labor Index2.1%—
τ²-bench Airline72%—
τ²-bench Banking25.3%—
τ²-bench Retail72.4%—
τ²-bench Telecom84.9%—
Cybench60%—
DeepResearch Bench52.6%—
OSWorld62.9%—
LMArena Search1159—
METR Time Horizons67.4%—
Vending-Bench 23,839—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#113), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14621100
ARC-AGI-213.6%—
SimpleBench54.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)37.3%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval6%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench83.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
LMCA38.8%—
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.84—
ForecastBench61.9—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 31.9 (#190), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math14481151
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)23.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
ProofBench19%—
Omni-MATH55.3%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
MATH Level 597.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)15.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#70), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert14831067
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam13.7%—
SimpleQA Verified30.7%—
MMLU-Pro86.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)68.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.1 (#84), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
VPCT39.8%—
LMArena Document1450—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.6 (#65), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14251058
LMArena Chinese14591061
LMArena French14591134
LMArena German14271080
LMArena Japanese1390966
LMArena Korean1403894
LMArena Russian14361111
LMArena Spanish14571111

Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.2 (#74), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14591087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
IFEval85%—

Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#45), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14761088

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.7 (#33), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text14391110
LMArena Creative Writing14421083
LMArena Multi-Turn14651068
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1678—
WildBench85.4%—
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper