Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs ERNIE 5.1

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 14.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index29.243.8
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Coding12861488
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), ERNIE 5.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
BALROG19.3%—
LMArena Search—1227

Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12511481
NYT Connections (extended)—23.4%
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Math12441481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Expert12081492
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), ERNIE 5.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Non-English12381454
LMArena Chinese12291508
LMArena French12641488
LMArena German12371470
LMArena Japanese11751422
LMArena Korean11731427
LMArena Russian12531459
LMArena Spanish12611473

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Instruction Following12411460
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Longer Query12611462

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuERNIE 5.1
LMArena Text12551468
LMArena Creative Writing12331441
LMArena Multi-Turn12651471
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and ERNIE 5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper