Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Palm 2
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 25.6.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 994 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1005 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1049 |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1010 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Palm 2?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Palm 2 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.