Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 7B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1042 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1017 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1022 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 963 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemma 7B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 7B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 7B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.