Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Palm 2
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 25.6.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 994 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1005 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1049 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1010 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Palm 2?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Palm 2 better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.