Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Mistral Nemo
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Mistral Nemo?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.