Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Ministral 3B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 41.9 to 10.4.
- Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.1 |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Ministral 3B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Ministral 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.