Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Ministral 3B

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 40.6 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • GLM-5V-Turbo accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 131K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Ministral 3B specifications
GLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Mistral AI
Noometry Index43.826.2
Released2026-04-012024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K131K
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$4$0.10
Results tracked196

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena WebDev1401—
LMArena Coding1466—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
DTBench—51.7%
LMCA—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.1

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Math1441—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1452—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Ministral 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1488—
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Russian1431—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1423—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1438—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1437—
LMArena Creative Writing1416—
LMArena Multi-Turn1432—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Ministral 3B?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo does, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper