Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Llama 2-7B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1002 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1009 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 970 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1006 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 999 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Llama 2-7B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Llama 2-7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.