Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Granite 4.0 Micro
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 41.2 to 9.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.