Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Laguna M.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 32.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Laguna M.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.