Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 42.1.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1210 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1208 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.