Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.5 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 52.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.