Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. GLM-5V-Turbo costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 36.6.
- GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 52.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 400K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $168 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.41 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1443 | — |
| LMArena German | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. GLM-5V-Turbo costs 30× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-5.2 Pro?
GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.