Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4.7 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 76.8% for Grok 4.7.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 53.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 76.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1413 |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.53 |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1422 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1400 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1404 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Grok 4.7 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.