Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.8

Rank #82 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 62.6 to 47.4.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and GLM-4.7-Flash specifications
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderOpenAIZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index43.838.8
Released—2026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding14131383

Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14241356
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
Chess Puzzles—0%

Math Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Math14071355
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—58.3%

Knowledge Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Expert14011357
GPQA Diamond—60.5%
Confabulations16.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Vision1243—

Multilingual Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14191330
LMArena Chinese14571403
LMArena French14461332
LMArena German14231337
LMArena Korean13961283
LMArena Russian14291332
LMArena Spanish14341350
LMArena Japanese1405—

Instruction Following Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14031327

Long Context Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14131345

Writing & Preference Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14291351
LMArena Creative Writing14051297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15011125
LMArena Multi-Turn14541342

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 40.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper