Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1455 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), ERNIE 5.0 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1445 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1437 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | 1428 |
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | 1249 |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1297 | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1473 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1413 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1434 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.