Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3-4B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 28.5.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3-4B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.231.5
Released—2025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked206

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1455—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1446—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
LMArena Math1437—

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1427—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Qwen3-4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1512—
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1462—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-4B
LMArena Text1445—
LMArena Creative Writing1426—
LMArena Multi-Turn1433—

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3-4B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper