Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 55.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Thematic Generalization: 41.7% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 20.3% for Mistral Medium 3.1.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderBaiduMistral AI
Noometry Index41.831.9
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked203

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Coding1455—

Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%6.5%
Thematic Generalization41.7%20.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—

Math Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Math1437—

Knowledge Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Expert1428—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1512—
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text1445—
LMArena Creative Writing1426—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1476
LMArena Multi-Turn1434—

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper